A Message from Hardy Jones about Dolphin Hunting

 

BlueVoiceDuring 2012, Hardy Jones traveled to the country and confirmed the gruesome truth for himself.

“And in 2013, BlueVoice funded surveys that document the widespread hunting and consumption of dolphin all along the coast of Peru.

Dolphin-hunting fishermen pour pesticides and other toxic chemicals into the water to immobilize the dolphins to make them easier to catch. They apparently are unaware that this cruel technique means that any meat eaten from such a dolphin would be extraordinarily contaminated and dangerous.

Based the gravity of this situation in Peru we have determined the best way to end this practice is to bring the facts to international organizations such as the scientific committee of the International Whaling Commission and the Convention on Migratory Species.

Hunting dolphins is illegal under Peruvian law. But the law is not enforced. Exposing this ghastly situation in international meetings will bring pressure on Peru, a nation highly dependent on international tourism, to enforce laws already on the books and save the lives of thousands of dolphins.

I worked in Peru as a Peace Corps volunteer and have great empathy for the many poor and hungry people. But the solution to the poverty is not killing and eating dolphins. It is to initiate sound fishing practices and restore one of the world’s most productive fisheries.

Dolphin meat is highly contaminated with heavy metals and organic pollutants such as PCBs. It should not be consumed as food. Villagers who do eat it have an extraordinary level of diabetes, a disease associated with ingestion of high levels of pollutants.”

For more information on BlueVoice, please click here http://bit.ly/153lkbQ

The dolphins are magnificent creatures who don’t deserve this!

dolphin

 

 

Posted in Blogs | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Shark Finning is Big in Mozambique

Image

taken by Fiona Ayerst

Yesterday, a female great white shark was killed, and her fins were brutally cut off by fisherman on the beach in Inhambane, Mozambique. The day before that, another female white shark become entangled in a fisherman’s net and subsequently suffocated. Later, her fins were cut off on the beach in Jangamo, Mozambique. The Chinese recently began targeting this area in order to get shark fins for shark fin soup. They have even been distributing heavy duty fishing nets to fisherman. Although shark finning is legal in Mozambique, the trading of GWS body parts is a violation of both Mozambique law and CITES (Convention on International Trade of Endangered Species) appendix 2. In fact, great whites are endangered because of extreme hunting and unregulated trade. When sharks are killed for their fins, 95% of their body mass is often wasted. Sharks are valuable to the vitality of oceanic ecosystems because they function as key predators. If we don’t take precautions to protect these magnificent animals, they won’t be here for that much longer. Hopefully, we can convince the people of Mozambique why it is important to not let the existence of the great white, and other sharks, become a thing of the past. Please share what’s going on with people you know!

Image

Posted in Blogs | Leave a comment

Dolphin Slaughter in Peru

A butchered dolphin.

A slaughtered dolphin.

Each year, around 3,000 dolphins are cruelly killed along the Peruvian coast, even though this has illegal since 1995. Unlike in Taiji, Japan, these innocent animals are not hunted within view of the shore. Rather, the illegal slaughter is hidden from public view, and conducted out at sea. The dolphins are corralled into nets, and then harpooned and brought aboard the boat. As if that weren’t bad enough, the defenseless animals are then brutally clubbed to death by the eager fisherman for over five minutes, or however long it takes the dolphins to die. Before the fisherman return to shore, they remove the meat and dump the rest of the body overboard. Stefan Austermühle, Executive Director of Mundo Azul, always finds the sight of dead dolphins to be a “horrific experience. The head and the fluke of the animal are the only parts still being intact. They are connected to each other only by the spine. All the meat has been stripped of the body and the intestines have been fallen off while the body was floating in the sea. The deep cuts of a knife around the head and fluke prove that the animal had been butchered.” The mercury-laden dolphin meat is sold for a little over one dollar at local black markets. The consumption of dolphin meat has been suggested to be linked to diabetes in humans, which has been proven in 240 scientific papers. In fact, research has shown that communities where people consume dolphin meat have an increased incidence of diabetes. Recently, the mayor of Peru has pledged to do all he can to end this sad slaying of dolphins. This is positive news for both the dolphins and the health of the Peruvian people! Please help to spread awareness of this merciless slaughter. That is the only way it will be stopped.

dolphin

Posted in Blogs | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Less Than Two Weeks Into Killing Season

Less than two weeks have passed since Taiji, Japan’s annual dolphin hunting season began and already, the lives of 22 dolphins have been unjustly taken for meat; 24 were taken into captivity for a life behind glass walls. Each season, the Taiji fisherman catch up to 2,300 of Japan’s annual quota of 20,000 dolphins.  The cetaceans put up the fight of their lives in order to escape from the merciless fisherman. It’s depressing to imagine the anxious dolphins spy hopping in the Cove as they await their fate, and it is even more horrific to know the inhumane manner in which they are killed. For many, their death is drawn out as long as 10 slow, agonizing minutes. Sakae Hemmi, a spokeswoman for the Japanese environmental protection group, Elsa Nature Conservancy, has commented, “Even if they let them go, the structure of the dolphins’ group is disrupted.” 

Please act now to end this brutal slaughter by signing the petition to Save the Taiji Dolphins

For more information on the dolphin hunt, please go HERE

Posted in Blogs | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Risk of Infectious Diseases vs. Marine Conservation

Along with directly impacting the well being, humans also have the potential to indirectly threaten marine populations. The ecologic and climactic changes that arise due to human activities can result in the spread of infectious diseases.

As marine life becomes more increasingly exposed to humans and domesticated and feral animals, the prevalence of infectious disease will increase. Animals that forage close to areas of human activity could be increasingly affected by exposure to contaminated waters from sewage and freshwater runoff. For example, the parasite Toxoplasma gondii is transmitted primarily through cat feces and reaches ocean waters through contaminated runoff. Over the past decade, there have been incidences of monk seal mortality due to T. gondii infection. Because the overall population of monk seals is declining, it is even more troublesome that the risk of encountering diseases and contaminants is likely to increase. In 2010, there were only 1,100 monk seals left in the wild. If you have a cat, please do not flush its litter down the toilet; sewage treatment doesn’t always kill the parasite’s eggs. 

Exposure to environmental contaminants such as pollutants and certain trace elements can compromise animals’ immune responses, which will result in increased risk of infectious diseases. For example, in the late 1990s, high adult mortality rates were seen in sea otters, with the major cause of death being infectious disease.

As inhabitants of this planet, we have a responsibility to help these creatures that we live with. We need to be more responsible about the impacts we have on both the environment and animal life.

Posted in Blogs | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

A Surprising Great White Shark Attack

Orcas are the big, magnificent creatures that you see blasting out of the water at Sea World. But they’re more than that; they’re clever, courageous creatures that love their freedom. Unrestricted in the wild, they even have ingenious hunting methods, which they teach to their offspring. For instance, orcas in the Antarctic Ocean create waves with their tails in order to knock seals off floating blocks of ice.

In October of 1997, a great white shark was attacked by an orca at the Farallon Islands, which are located outside of San Francisco. This orca was a member of the L.A. pod, also called “the odd pod,” because it was more opportunistic, and didn’t stick to one type of food source as other pods do.

What was remarkable about this incident of predation was that the great white shark didn’t put up a struggle, and there was no blood at the scene of the crime. The orca, also known as CA2, subdued this formidable predator by inducing tonic immobility, which is a trance-like state. After colliding with it underwater, she held the dazed white shark upside down at the surface for fifteen minutes.

An orca hunting a mako shark in New Zealand.

There is a possibility that this female orca knew that holding the shark upside down would result in tonic immobility from past experience with sharks. In fact, other orcas have been known to employ the same technique of turning sharks over in order to render them easy meals.

Every fall, great whites come to the Farallon Islands to prey on the elephant seals that gather there. However, during the remainder of the feeding season, no sharks were observed at these islands, even though there was an abundance of seals. It appeared that they had become fearful of orcas. In November of 2007, an orca pod ventured close to the Farallones, and a male was observed predating on a white shark. Just like before, no blood was seen in the water, and the sharks disappeared from the area for the rest of the feeding season. Data from the satellite tag of a male white shark called Tipfin showed that he dove down to a depth 500 meters and then swam to Hawaii, located more than 2,000 miles away. To this day, the “flight of the sharks” is still a mystery.

    I believe provides a good case for why orcas should not be held captive in marine parks such as Sea World. Why would we want to deprive them of their right to pursue such innovative hunting techniques?

National Geographic did an episode on this incident, so if you are intrigued as much as I was, I suggest you watch it.

Posted in Blogs | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Minds In the Water, Dave Rastovich’s Journey to Activism

I am sorry that it’s been so long since I’ve written. I’ve been having health issues, but I will hopefully be blogging more often from now on.

Today, I attended the Awareness Film Festival in Los Angeles to see the film “Minds in the Water.” I previously blogged about this movie when I first heard about it (“Surfing For Thought: Minds in the Water”). Now that I have seen it, I can give you my account and more insight into the movie.

Dave Rastovich, known by his friends as ‘Rasta,’ is more than just a professional surfer. He spends much of his free time as an activist, defending the rights of dolphins and whales. He founded the organization, Surfers For Cetaceans, to promote and support the conservation of cetaceans. On the show’s site, Rastovich lists the “Universal Declaration of Marine Mammal Rights.” Any proponent of captivity would be well-advised to read them.

The film begins with images depicting dolphins and whales swimming free in their natural environment, unconcerned with the anthropogenic dangers that lurk around them. If only this depiction could become a reality.

Rastovich’s commitment to the cause started when he felt a calling from the ocean. One day while he and a friend were surfing, they spied the dark shape of a shark coming towards them. Suddenly, as if out of nowhere, a dolphin had careened toward them and rammed into the shark’s gut. The dolphin’s act of heroism saved their lives. Rastovich, it was almost as if the universe had spoken to him, urging him to give back in return for his life being spared.

Paul Watson, the spearhead behind Sea Shepherd, makes an appearance in the film. Rastovich spent a few days aboard the Sea Shepherd vessel, learning about whaling and Sea Shepherd’s efforts. The film describes the profitable industry that was established when whale hunting was converted to whale tourism. In comparison to whaling, not only is ecotourism sustainable, but it is a humane alternative.
Rastovich became so committed to the plight of the cetaceans that for a couple of years,

The “smile” of a killer

everything else in his life, including his family, became secondary. He believes that we all need to become caretakers and defenders of our coastlines and the cetaceans. Rastovich’s journey led him to becoming acquainted with the Oceanic Preservation Society (OPS) and Ric O’ Barry, who created the movie “The Cove.” Rastovich traveled to the “killing cove,” which is located in Taiji, Japan. It is the here where thousands of dolphins each year pay for their popularity with their lives. A select few are chosen to become exhibitions at aquariums, while the others are brutally murdered. In the cove, Rastovich and five other surfers/activists, including Hayden Panettiere and Isabel Lucas, formed a paddle-out circle, to protest the dolphin hunt.

Traditionally the surfer’s circle is a memorial ceremony, done to show remembrance to a departed friend. But this circle was formed to show remembrance to the dolphins that annually lose their lives in Taiji. The six activists returned to shore only after being forced back by the threatening jabs of forked poles. It was an emotional scene, haunted by dolphins’ screams and Panettiere’s cries. Rastovich describes his feelings of defeat, and how difficult it was for him to turn around, when he wanted nothing more than to free the frightened mammals.

This movie details Rastovich’s journey to activism, but he represents all of our voices. Rastovich was inspired to act about a cause that he was passionate about, something we should all do. If you want to help, you don’t have to do something as monumental as starting an organization or travelling to distant countries, but if we each changed one small thing about our lives, we could help change the world. We can all be courageous in our own ways. In fact, if you haven’t already, I invite you to (please) “sign” the Minds in the Water Visual Petition. All you have to do is  upload a picture of yourself holding a picture of a dolphin or whale. The petition serves as a reminder that the world hasn’t given up on defending these creatures.

I urge everybody to see this film. It is an honest and inspiring account of a surfer turned activist.

“Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter” ~ Martin Luther King, Jr.

Related: “Surfing for Thought: Minds in the Water” & “Taiji Cove

Posted in Blogs | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Potential End of Dolphin-Hunting Season And Taiji Whale Ranch

The "smile" of a killer

With the exception of the slaughter of pilot whales, dolphin hunting in Taiji, Japan may be over for the season (Save Japan Dolphins). Don’t start cheering, yet; our work isn’t over. The slaughter will resume next September. But there is reason to be hopeful: The season usually continues until May, so the efforts to end dolphin killing in Taiji seems to be paying off. Finally. Further, demand in Japan for such mercury-contaminated meat has declined, and the numbers of dolphins killed each year have declined from about 20,000 to estimated 728-786 dolphins. While there is cause to celebrate this reduction in number, it still means that almost 1,000 dolphins are needlessly and cruelly being killed. Watch any video about the killings (for instance, below), and you will understand what I mean. As I have previously blogged (“Killing Taiji Dolphins is Anything But Painless“), these dolphins are subjected to absolute agony before finally being allowed to die in “peace”; they are first forced to watch their family being killed, and then they slowly suffocate and bleed to death. While reading about or even watching this may be difficult, think about how much harder it must be for them to suffer through it. 

As Save Japan Dolphins pointed out in a blog post on March 1, the Taiji town fathers are getting desperate due to the decline in demand for dolphin meat. They have set in motion building plans for a “Petting Whale Farm,” where visitors will be able to interact with minke and pilot whales and dolphins.  As documented by the Daily Yomiuri on February 27 (English translation):

Because of the negative image of the drive hunt painted by the Academy Award winning US movie “The Cove,” there has been interference by foreign anti-whaling organizations.

The town Mayor Kazutaka Sangen said, “We see the unfavorable circumstances as our opportunity to promote our town because we have co-existed with whales for generations. We will turn Taiji into a national park and museum with a whale theme.”

Naomi A. Rose, Ph.D, who has studied and condemned the captivity of dolphins would have much to say on this topic. While the ‘whale ranch’ has been proposed to include an area around the park that is reserved as a “scientific research area” for researchers to observe the reproduction of the cetaceans in the bay, to advocate that this ranch would be built for the benefit of the cetaceans is a contradiction in itself. There are better alternatives, such as ecotourism.

To read more about how YOU can help these innocent creatures, please click here.

Posted in Blogs | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

The Insight of a Shark Attack Survivor

I have blogged about the subject of shark nets before (“Shark Culling is NOT the Answer”).  Those in favor of shark culling argue that nets reduce the amount of shark attacks by catching and killing large predatory sharks. They say that since shark culling began, there have been no fatalities due to shark attacks on culled beaches. Activists and environmentalists contend that these nets are damaging to all marine life alike, as they do not discriminate between sharks, whales, seals, dolphins, rays, or even sea turtles. The NSW Greens MP, Cate Faehrmann, told the Sydney Morning Herald that shark nets are nothing but a “psychological comfort to swimmers.” In fact, she views them as ineffective. “The nets were supposed to be a barrier to stop sharks reaching shallow water, but in reality almost half of shark entanglements occur on the beach side of the nets,” she said.

Lisa Mondy survived an attack last year at the jaws of a great white shark. Despite this, she has since advocated for the removal of shark nets. On January 18, Australian surfer Glen “Lenny” Folkard was attacked by a shark (believed to be a young great white or bull shark) at Redhead Beach. Redhead Beach, which is about 100 miles north of Sydney, is a netted beach. To Mondy and Greens campaigners, this instance only further fuels the argument that shark nets need to be eradicated. “Shark netting was introduced over 70 years ago and is now outdated and in dire need of revising.”

Is there another alternative? Yes. Mondy suggests a warning system that could take various factors, such as water visibility and movement of prey, into account, and allow swimmers and surfers analyze the risks themselves and make their own decisions about whether they should venture out into the water that day. While people may disagree about methods that could decrease the risk of shark attacks, one thing is clear: People need to be educated. Every time we enter the ocean, we are sharing it with its natural inhabitants. Fear is not an acceptable excuse for removing individuals from their own environment. Further, sharks are also vital to the oceanic environment. Removing them could produce effects that reverberate throughout the marine ecosystem.

And if a shark attach victim such as Lisa Mondy could argue against shark culling, what does that say about the nets? 

Posted in Blogs | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Captivity: Home Away From Home?

Jacques Cousteau, the famous marine conservationist, once said, “No aquarium, no tank in a marine land, however spacious it may be, can begin to duplicate the conditions of the sea.”

Tilikum killed three people while in captivity, thought to be related to behavioral problems associated with captivity.

Flipper the dolphin, Shamu the killer whale, and Andre the sea lion have even become centerpieces of modern day culture. These exhibits have turned beautiful free-ranging animals into public spectacles, and placed them at the center of a never-ending circus arena. Forced to perform for crowds in enclosures that are too small, these animals often suffer severe behavioral and biological problems.

It is incredibly difficult to replicate the varying conditions of a natural underwater environment. In the wild, cetaceans travel great distances through the open ocean, free to porpoise through waves and roam at their will. Comparatively, in captivity, these animals swim in patterns within the confines of closed pools. Captive dolphins, including killer whales, spend most of their time swimming in tight circles or resting listlessly at the water’s surface. Their wild counterparts spend most of their time in deeper waters, with many species spending less than 20% of their time at the water’s surface.

Cetaceans are incredibly intelligent, social animals and it is impossible to replicate the dynamics of the social groups of wild animals. Lack of freedom in captivity and forced, unnatural social interaction can result in agitation and aggression.

Since 1968, four people have been killed by captive orcas, and over 50 people have been injured. For instance, Sea World’s orca Tilikum, is responsible for three deaths – two trainers and a civilian. The public may remember the media frenzy that arose after Tilikum pulled his trainer, Dawn Brancheau, underwater and subsequently drowned her. Jonathan Smith, a trainer at Sea World, was almost drowned by two orcas, after they grasped him within their jaws and dragged him to the bottom of their tank.

While orcas may be large predatory animals, there have been no records of wild orcas attacking humans. People have fallen into wild orca pods without serious harm. No wild orca has ever been sighted pulling someone off of a beach and dragging them underwater, despite them using this adapted behavior to hunt. A wild orca named Luna, who lived in the Puget Sound, was known to playfully interact with humans, even seeming to crave human contact.

A captive orca performs to hundreds of people every day in a marine park.

Confinement can lead dolphins to become distressed, with accounts of some even starving or abusing themselves by banging their heads on the walls, as Ric O’Barry, a former dolphin trainer for the “Flipper” TV series, found when he studied a dolphin nicknamed “Big Boy” in Nassau, Bahamas. Big Boy was known to frequently bang his head on the wooden gate of his sea pen.

Dolphins have been observed acting out in an aggressive manner towards other dolphins, and have even caused injury to humans, likely due to the stress caused by the confinement in small enclosures. Earlier this year there were reports of two dolphins involved in a head on collsion, which resulted in their deaths, while in 2008, a dolphin at a swim-with-the-dolphins (SWTD) facility in Curacao breached out of the water to land directly on top of three tourists nearby, causing significant harm. Although cited as an accidental “bump,” the dolphin was perceived to have deliberately maneuvered itself.

Captivity is highly correlated with significant physical and mental stress in dolphins, which manifests in high infant mortality rates, lower life expectancy, and aggression between themselves and humans. In the wild, dolphins can live to be 25 to 50 years old, while orcas can live to be 50 to 80 years old; however, most dolphins only survive up to six years in captivity, with more than half not surviving more than two years. Most orcas rarely survive more than ten years in captivity.

Some people theorize that dolphins can commit suicide. It is a tantalizing, if not

Dolphins are regularly made to perform in aquaria, to the detriment of their mental and physical health.

horrific idea. Ric O’Barry stated that Kathy, one of the dolphins that played Flipper, committed suicide while in his arms. He contends that due to the stress brought on by captivity, she intentionally stopped breathing. Research has been conducted on cetaceans to determine if they are capable of self-awareness and if they could indeed comprehend the idea of suicide.

Cetaceans are voluntary breathers, which means that they have conscious control over their blowholes. Thus, when they come to the surface of the water to breathe, they can choose whether or not to take a breath. It is for this reason that cetaceans require respirators in order to survive anesthesia. If you have ever seen a dolphin or orca sleep, you may have noticed that they rest in a semi-conscious state with their blowholes positioned above the water’s surface or in a position that allows them to easily rise to the water’s surface to breathe. Could Kathy have been so depressed in captivity that she ended her own life?

As we have begun to explore more and more of the oceans, more animals are discovered, thus adding to the ‘catalogue’ of organisms that aquariums attempt to keep in captivity. Large sharks have become the next in line to be subjected to aquarium life; however in comparison to cetaceans, there has been little success keeping them in captivity.

Despite the fact that large sharks are given huge areas of water to live in, it doesn’t quite make up for their usual swimming behaviors. Large sharks, especially pelagic species, cover massive distances and can have extensive migration patterns.

High stress levels cause sharks to stop eating and often engage in harmful behaviors such as rubbing along and bumping the walls of their enclosures. Researchers believe that because sharks are able to use vibrations and electrical currents to navigate through the water, they may be able to discriminate aquariums as not being a natural environment, making it even more difficult to replicate the varying factors of the open ocean. Most captive sharks seem to exhibit vastly different behaviors than those normally observed in the wild, as though the different electromagnetic currents confuse them and cause them to run into the walls of their enclosures. Equipment used to run the enclosure can further aggravate behavioral issues.

One of the first captive white sharks, Carcharodon carcharias, seemingly settled into its enclosure well, then began to show stress from the overhead lights being switched on and off, bumping into the walls when the lighting changed. The people involved in the husbandry of this shark described how the health of the animal quickly deteriorated as it became more aware of its surroundings.

Monterey Bay Aquarium in California set new records when they held a white

Monterey Bay Aquarium has had mixed success housing white sharks in captivity.

shark in their Open Sea enclosure for 198 days in 2004. Following this event, Monterey had varied success in maintaining the health of captive white sharks, with individuals living in the Open Sea pen for 11-162 days. Each shark was released alive and tracked via the Tagging of Pacific Predator (TOPP) study.

The most recent attempt at housing a white shark was August 2011, also by Monterey Bay Aquarium. The four-foot shark was held at the aquarium for 55 days before being released, and then died a week later at sea. An official report by the aquarium stated:

“Based on the shark’s behavior and condition prior to release, the Aquarium’s white  shark team had every confidence he would do well back in the wild, and that the release would be a success.”

Although the team involved with the husbandry of the shark believed release to be the best possible option for this particular individual, it is clear that something went wrong. It could be that the abrasions it suffered from hitting the glass wall of its tank induced infection, weakening it sufficiently to make survival in the wild unlikely. It may be that certain individuals are just not predisposed to captivity – some individuals do better than others.

There are many arguments to and for captivity of animals, both marine and terrestrial. On the one side, captivity allows the public to view animals that they otherwise would have no opportunity to interact with, potentially producing advocates for the species. It allows researchers to get close to these animals and potentially find out ground-breaking discoveries. However, on the other side of the coin, are we educating people that keeping endangered animals behind bars or glass walls is the only way we can conserve them? Aquariums suggest that a life in captivity for many animals is better, as it is sterile, protects animals from the “plight of the sea,” with plenty of good food, and quality medical care, but what is the cost of this? Perhaps a life spent within glass walls is more detrimental than it would seem. Ric O’ Barry said of his dolphin companions:

Baby dolphin born in captivity.

“I question the mental health of captive animals. After all, captivity changes them forever, and habitat dictates behavior.”

This article was published in the Beyond Blue Magazine, Issue 14 (pg. 24)

Related articles: The Captive Industry & Fin Collapse in Killer Whales

Posted in Blogs | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment